[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”4.16″ global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”4.16″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” _builder_version=”4.17.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
\n\u201cThere is an emerging concept that it is \u2018wrong\u2019 not to live in the present moment. Right or wrong is actually irrelevant because, once you live in the moment, not living in the moment falls out of your experience and therefore, out of your perception. When we talk about the power of the present, the people who are talking about it, living it and teaching it, their intention is to experience the choice point; the interface. They are therefore a part of your \u2018tribe of intention\u2019.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Duality needs something to push against. It defines itself by what it is not. This is not a mechanism for oneness, therefore, judgement is a concept of duality. \u00a0There is no need to be \u2018judge-mental\u2019 if you are not living an experience of duality. Within duality, it is not wrong to judge. Instead, it is part of the experience.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Another version of judgement would be what we refer to as wisdom. Wisdom is not judgement-al. Moving between duality and non-duality is part of what we will call the interface.There is a beauty in the interface that is not available, not appreciated, except in the interface.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Jen\u2019s question: \u201cIs there an idea of how many people currently exist in the interface versus what we are calling duality?\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u201cAs a percentage of human life on your planet, in this dimension, we would say 23%, roughly. However there is also intelligent life, existing at the same time, in other dimensions on planet Earth, who are also experimenting with some, although not all, of the same concepts. Percentages are different in those dimensions. Those numbers would not be useful to you in this context.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
We are, in your view, shifting our perspective as we speak. (tilting Lucca\u2019s head around). Over here, on Lucca\u2019s left, is an element of change coming for this planet, which has to do with mobility. You would call it travel or transportation. We call it mobility because it begins on a cellular level and moves to the level of multi-celled organisms and items.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
This shift, for which you have been waiting \u2013 \u2018waiting\u2019 being an element of time that is not actually useful \u2013 this element is on the edge, over the left shoulder of your perception. As you shift your perception, you will avail yourselves of the possibilities of moving without having to burn fuel, which will make things faster and easier. You will then need to find a new organising principle for life on the planet. A great deal of your time and energy is involved in the many aspects of moving people and things on the planet.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Removing the requirement to move people and things, will necessitate a major reorientation around how you engage with one another. What will you do with the resources and energetic input currently engaged in building and maintaining roads and vehicles, bridges, railways, ports, airports, wires (power grids), tunnels, etc.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The infrastructure is challenging to grasp. It takes up real estate in your cities and communities. It takes time in your day. Removing it will leave a hole. There is nothing wrong with a hole but humanity will face a choice as to what it does with the freed resources, including time. What else will it do? How intentional will humanity be?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Mobility is a huge organising principle for humanity. Time is not just for doing things. It encompasses how long it takes to get somewhere or to move items from one point to another. How long does it take to assemble the resources to build something and then to build it? It\u2019s a form of puzzle, if you like. If this mobility element disappears, then what? If you begin to think about powering\/organizing in another way, how might that alter all of the activities, processes and concepts that depend on the old concept of mobility?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
It\u2019s a ponderance. It will open doors for you to step through but only for those of you who are already looking for a door. The rest of you won\u2019t even see a door. And that is not right or wrong; it\u2019s a choice.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
<\/p>\n
Lucca’s Comments:<\/p>\n
Although I didn\u2019t ask about \u2018mobility\u2019 in this session, the idea isn\u2019t completely foreign to me. In this channeling, my Intergalactic team introduced the concept of ‘The Interface’, which is a term I had not used until now. I had thought of the liminal space in which I often find myself, as a sort of bridge. I find I like the term Interface, as well as the idea that we are at choice around it. I invite you to stretch your imagination, if you haven\u2019t already, into the ramifications of a future without \u2018mobility\u2019 as we have known it. What do you imagine might replace it?<\/p>\n
* * *<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
I invite you to check out more She Who Knows Blog\/Pod<\/em> posts: www.powersourcerer.com<\/p>\n
Follow me on Social Media:<\/p>\n
FB\u00a0Lucca Hallex Power Sourcerer<\/a><\/span>
IG powersourcerer<\/a><\/span>
LinkedIn Lucca Hallex<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n